Friday, May 16, 2008

Jaipur Terror: Politicians Still Busy With Policy of Appeasement


In the past three years, this is the 21st terror attack outside Jammu & Kashmir. More than 400 people have been killed in the terror strikes since Oct 2005. India had more than 2,300 terrorism-related deaths in 2007 - about 10% of a worldwide figure of 22,000 terrorism-related deaths that year. The Jaipur attack might have been worse had three unexploded bombs not been defused in the walled city area. The macabre statistics pose a serious question to our corrupt, outdated and over burdened law enforcement and legal systems.

One of the suspects in the serial bomb blasts in Jaipur on 13th May has been identified as SIMI activist Abu Faisal. He had been arrested from a hotel in the Gwaltoli area of the Indore in 2006, but was later released on bail. Faisal has been actively involved in anti-national and illegal activities since his release and was absconding after March 27, 2007.

All District Collectors and Superintendents of Police in Rajasthan have been directed to complete within 30 days the process of identifying Bangladeshi migrants living with or without voter ID Cards and/or ration cards and get them verified. The procedures for deporting the identified illegal nationals could then be started. Did we have to wait for such an exercise to commence?

An outfit calling itself Indian Mujahideen has claimed responsibility for the mass murder in Jaipur. There is little doubt that the tag Indian Mujahideen is a smoke screen to camouflage Pakistani roots of jihadi terror and present it as a homegrown phenomenon. When Mohammed Jalaluddin - alias Babu Bhai, the "Indian operations commander" of the Bangladesh-based militant group, Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami (Huji), at the time of his arrest - was arrested in Lucknow in 2007, he told his IB interrogators that Jaipur and Haridwar were few of the prime targets for terror strikes. Yet the terror strike could not be prevented! A native of West Bengal, Jalaluddin was trained in Bangladesh and then sent to unleash terror in India in 1999. He claimed involvement in the July 2006 serial train bombings in Bombay, in which 209 people were killed. His trial is yet to be concluded in the painfully slow legal labyrinths of the Indian legal system. It should not surprise anyone if another hijacking like the IC 814 in 1999, forces the government of India to release him in exchange for hostages; or execution of his sentence delayed by deranged politicians and power hungry political parties out to grab Muslim votes; never mind more such strikes in the country.

Based on Jalaluddin's confessions, India's Intelligence Bureau did issue advice last year, listing a number of cities like Jaipur that it said were on the "hit list" of the jihadis. When nothing happened for a few months, the warning found its usual place, in the garbage dump. Unfortunately, intelligence agencies rarely chase up leads to get more specific intelligence and when something like Jaipur happens, they refer to their old report to save their necks.

The Jaipur serial blasts must be seen in conjunction with the recent infiltration attempts in Kashmir, gun battles along the border, and the new democratic government of Pakistan’s promise to deport Dawood Ibrahim - the mafia don blamed for bombings in Mumbai in 1993, to India. The move has obviously not gone down well with Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) as the agency has traditionally exploited Dawood Ibrahim’s criminal network to export arms, explosives, drugs and terrorism in Asia and elsewhere. The ISI now operates more through Nepal and Bangladesh, where they have developed a secure network of operatives who liaise with militant groups such as Lashkar-e-Toiba or the Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami. The Huji and the Lashkars have scores of sleeper cells all over India ready to strike on direction of Pakistan’s ISI.

But the real strength of the Islamic jihadi groups responsible for explosions in Kashmir and other Indian states lies not so much in the "foreign hand" but in the proliferation of these "sleeper cells" within India. The need for laws like the TADA or POTA to curb terror menace was never so acute. The serial bomb blasts in Jaipur must be recognised as a national shame and a challenge by Pakistan’s ISI and Muslim terror outfits to all Indians. The impact of the dastardly crime must not be restricted to Rajasthan and the families of those killed. Localising such cowardly misdeeds by fanatics would amount to condoning the mass murder and encourage these medieval philosophers to repeat their sordid performance elsewhere. It is high time the Indian politicians stopped blaming “foreign hand” euphemism for Pakistan and discard all indirect references to countries involved in encouraging terrorism. Unless the calculating political establishment shuns all shallow vote bank politics and resolves to hold the terrorism bull by its horns, more Jaipur like strikes and scores more innocent deaths are just waiting to be reported.

Saturday, May 10, 2008

Blast in SIMI Terrorists' Trial Court

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Explosion_in_Hubli_court_no_casualty/articleshow/3027753.cms

The explosion is an attempt to intimidate the judge hearing the case of seven SIMI terror suspects. Fortunately there are no casualties! The incident should strengthen state resolve to come down on the terrorists with an iron hand. SIMI’s twisted philosophy reflected in its slogan “Allah is our Lord, Qur’an is our constitution, Muhammad is our leader, Jihad is our way and Shahadat is our desire", is outdated and more suited to Pakistan and medeival arab states than to a modern and forward looking India. Its self delusionary beliefs that Osama bin Laden is an outstanding example of a true Mujahid, who has undertaken Jihad on behalf of the 'ummah' and that Israel's Mossad was responsible for the 9/11 attacks, render the fanatic outfit a misfit in any civilised society. SIMI’s intolerance for secularism, democracy and nationalism, keystones of the Indian Constitution, also loudly proclaim its deranged thinking and intellectual malnutrition.

The bombing incident in Hubli court must be taken seriously even if there are no casualties. There is no hiding the intention of the terrorists.

Meddling Communists Accuse the PM of Incompetence


Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee of West Bengal has a fantastic sense of humour accusing Manmohan Singh of being inefficient and incompetent. His assertion that West Bengal is suffering due to Manmohan Singh's incompetence, is also laughable. The communists might as well blame Manmohan Singh for the hooliganism displayed by CPM cadres in Nandigram. There is nothing new in the state not performing well under communist misrule. That is the story the world over, whether it was the Soviet Union, China, Vietnam, Cuba or North Korea. He should know that inflation is a world wide phenomenon and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is more than adequately capable of handling the situation for India. Perhaps Buddhadeb would prefer one of his comrades to handle the crisis like Kim Jong-Il is doing in North Korea – simply print more currency.

If the communists are not satisfied with the performance of Manmohan Singh and, in their perception, the whole country is suffering due to his failure to perform his duties and responsibilities as a Prime Minister on all fronts, the communists are to blame too. Why are they supporting the Congress at all and helping to have an incompetent Prime Minister? In any case, I wonder who appointed Buddhadeb a spokesperson for the whole country! The communists did promise outside support to the Manmohan Singh government but have only extended interference from all sides. If the Chief Minister is keen to have better governance in West Bengal, he should reign in his goons who went on a murderous spree in Nandigram, restrain the other meddling comrades from interfering in functioning of the PMO and come up with more intelligent suggestions than to do away with the posts of state governors.


Buddhadeb Bhattacharya has also accused the Prime Minister of neglecting the interests of the common man. Now isnt that too much coming from murderers of Nandigram? West Bengal has been under communist misrule for over three decades. It is not too difficult to comprehend the true reason for communists blaming Manmohan Singh for being the cause of all their ills.


Friday, May 9, 2008

Arjun Singh Put in His Place



http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Congress_snubs_Arjun_Singh_again/articleshow/3025511.cms

The Congress has finally begun to put its 'dead wood' in the right place. Arjun Singh has always had a long rope in the Party and this was the right moment to remind him of his standing in the establishment. Cronies like him, whose caliber doesn’t match his political ambitions, can only fetch a bad name to the Party and the government.

Quixotic Anbumani and His Moronic Supporters


http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Venugopal_back_at_AIIMS_within_hours/articleshow/3022799.cms
With a frustrated Anbumani Ramadoss still the health minister, it is unlikely that the Supreme Court's direction will see a prompt implementation. The political establishment that supported Anbumani in his nefarious 'remove Venugopal' campaign is also not going to be too keen in restoring Venugopal his legitimate position back to him in a hurry. Under the circumstances, Dr Venugopal can be excused for overlooking the red tape and assuming charge at the AIIMS. The action will, ofcourse, infuriate the already incensed PMK and Left parties. Hopefully, the morons who cheered Anbumani on during his quixotic venture will refrain from doing any further damage to their already shattered image.

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Constant Sources of Embarrassment for the PM



The decent Mr Manmohan Singh will do well to remember that it is better to have wise enemies than to have foolish friends. Once again, Anbumani Ramadoss, with the support of trouble making Left, has landed him with an embarrassment over the 'Remove Venu Amendment' to AIIMS Act of 2007. It would be too much to expect the thick skinned PMK and the Left, who were mainly instrumental in pushing through the personal vendetta amendment in the Parliament, to feel any shame by the Supreme Court verdict quashing it. These are parties who have collected the worst in the country to form their respective ranks.

Known for its opportunistic bent of mind, the PMK advocates bifurcation of Tamil Nadu on caste lines, was part of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government from 1999 to 2004 and then switched sides, and loyalties, to dump the NDA to join the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government in 2004. In Tamil Nadu it has the Communist Party of India as a major political partner; hence the blind support extended by the Left in Anbumani Ramadoss’ personal battle against Dr Venugopal, in total disregard for democratic norms and all sense of decency.

The Left Front comprising of Communist party of India (Marxist) [CPI (M)], Communist Party of India (CPI), Revolutionary Socialist Party (RSP) and the All India Forward Bloc (AIFB), is a rigidly disciplined totalitarian outfit which depends on murderous cadres and which has no real patience with democracy and dissent. The Left has rigidly opposed the Indo – US Nuclear Deal, has a sordid record of governance in West Bengal, Tripura and Kerala, opposed any economic reforms that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh proposed, acted as China proxy in the country, proposed strengthening of under performing public sector, supported divisive policies like reservation in higher education and jobs, and, after the Nandigrm episode, is generally considered as the party comprising of goons. No wonder the CPM is plagued by increasing dropouts, and problems in getting whole-timers? The communists have even made a ridiculous proposal to establish a pro-China regional alliance.

To top it all they have questioned the conduct of the Governor in West Bengal in switching off the lights of Raj Bhawan when Kolkata was forced to endure one of the frequent power cuts. They have even raised a doubt over the necessity of having the post of governors in states. Sixty years on, India can in fact, legislatively do away with the communists and the likes of Prakash Karat, D Raja, AB Burdhan and Sitaram Yechury. With friends (read coalition partners) like these, there cannot be anything but embarrassment, shame and disgrace for the Prime Minister and his party.

AIIMS: Supreme Court Verdict Not Enough for Shameless Anbumani Ramadoss to Resign



Supreme Court striking down the discriminatory law that facilitated the removal of cardiologist P Venugopal as the Director of All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) is a slap on the face of Mandal II Health Minister Anbumani Ramadoss. There was little doubt that the AIIMS Act was amended by Parliament at the behest of Anbumani Ramadoss just to satisfy his vendetta against Dr P Venugopal. A bench of Justices Tarun Chatterjee and H S Bedi upheld the appeal filed by Dr Venugopal challenging the law as being discriminatory and purposely brought in to superannuate him. He had contended that the amendment was brought with the sole purpose of removing him from his office due to his differences with Ramadoss. The Supreme Court held that the Act was illegal as the High Court had in March last year upheld his continuation in the post and the matter was pending in the apex court. But Anbumani Ramadoss supported by the likes of Arjun Singh, RK Dhawan, Laloo Prasad Yadav and the ever trouble maker communists of Left, in the meantime, brought the amendment in Parliament. Ramadoss sacked Venugopal in November 2007 after parliament passed the law and it received President Pratibha Patil's assent.

It may be recalled that Anbumani Ramadoss, ever since he became the Health Minister, had functioned with a single point agenda of removing Dr P Venugopal from AIIMS, ignoring the more important responsibilities his position demanded. Most of his tenure was spent in eroding the premier medical institute and demolishing its reputation as a medical centre of excellence. It is amazing that the Health Minister was not bothered by 51% vacancies in the posts of doctors in government hospitals, 7% children in Madhya Pradesh dying before they reached their first birthday, 60% children in the country under the age of three being malnourished and total absence of planning in rural health; but had occupied himself with low level vote bank politics of reservation, gaining cheap publicity by constant interference in domains he is unfamiliar with, and ofcourse his main objective of ridiculing and removing Dr P Venugopal.

As Health Minister, he even accepted the post-graduate medical degrees of five English speaking nations: Britain, Canada, the US, Australia and New Zealand. The Medical Council of India (MCI), the apex medical education regulating body of the country does not recognise it. As per an act of parliament, MCI is the 'medical education recognising body' of the country. The health ministry cannot take a decision on foreign degrees completely by itself. Ramadoss’ ministry unilaterally recognised the post-graduate medical degrees without any reciprocal arrangement with those countries. He never bothered to explain the weird logic of his action.
Anbumani Ramadoss proposed quota for other backward classes (OBCs) in institutes of higher learning. Indian Medical Association(IMA) has been at loggerheads with the minister over the issue. Other hair brained schemes proposed by Anbumani Ramadoss included MBBS students to serve one year in rural India before being awarded a degree. According to him, compulsory rural service is the best way to set right the anomalies in public healthcare. He has conveniently ignored the fact that the students are not trained to serve in the villages and that rural health cannot be treated so casually, particularly when most Government funding goes to provide the best healthcare for urban India. Relying on students to provide healthcare amounts to giving second-class treatment to rural India. There is indeed a pressing need to correct the imbalance of doctors in rural and urban areas. But for that, the Minister should have concentrated on improving the 'Healthcare Centres' and their infrastructure instead of putting the cart before the horse and sending novice doctors there. Rural and socially disadvantaged people tend to have far more serious and complex medical problems that need more knowledge, expertise and experience. These problems are certainly beyond the capacity of young, unsupervised doctors. But that did not disturb Anbumani Ramadoss.
Instead of concentrating on his job instead of expressing an opinion on issues that he is totally clueless about, Anbumani Ramadoss busied himself proving his creative genius by devising ways to rid the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) of its Director, P Venugopal by pushing through an ordinance in the Parliament. A case in point is the Minister’s refusal to sign the degree certificates, a demand put forward by the agitating medical students in 2006. The flimsy ground for refusal to sign the document cited by the Minister that the signature on the certificates of Registrar Dr Sandeep Aggarwal, whose appointment he contended was illegal, is sufficient proof of his indifference to the plight of the young doctors who had no degrees to apply for a job. The fact that the resident doctors ended their strike on a promise of immediate issuance of their degree certificates by AIIMS administration, albeit minus the Minister’s signature, should have pleased the Minister as it had taken the initiative to solve a problem that was solely in his domain. Instead, the Minister chose to place his ego above the careers of the affected doctors and the problems of AIIMS, whose President he happened to be. To add insult to injury, Anbumani Ramadoss is a typical hypocrite has been mouthing niceties about the Dr P Venugopal. He may have succeeded in fooling the constituency that elected him. He is naive if he thinks he can fool the whole country by his 'Nothing Personal' comments on the Venugopal issue. The people can see him clearly for what he is.

It is a shame that other politicians of dubious public record, like RK Dhawan, Arjun Singh and Laloo Prasad Yadav joined Anbumani Ramadoss’ efforts to dislodge P Venugopal and interfere in the AIIMS. Given that Anbumani Ramadoss has shamelessly refused to resign and continues to be the Health Minister and President of AIIMS, the relief is bound to be temporary in nature. For, the Minister’s earlier belligerent stance towards the Institute’s Director P Venugopal and his penchant for interfering in the normal functioning of the Institute has once again been revived. The fact that Delhi High Court had earlier ruled in favor of the Director of AIIMS in the dispute did nothing to deter a bitter Ramadoss from bulldozing his ways in the AIIMS. That belligerence is set to grow with the Supreme Court verdict. The country can expect more mischief from a frustrated Health Minister.

Sunday, May 4, 2008

Police Serves Only Politicians and Criminals

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/6-yr-old_beaten_to_death_in_W_Bengal/articleshow/3009490.cms

A six-year-old boy was beaten to death by a neighbour at a village in Murshidabad district of West Bengal on 3rd Apr 2008, while three policemen present there stood as mute spectators. Inspite of the villagers pleading with them to intervene, the policemen did nothing to stop the heinous crime from being committed. Following the incident, women of the village came out of their homes with sticks and damaged two police vehicles parked at the spot. District police authorities suspended the three constables who were present when the child was being beaten up, along with an assistant sub-inspector who had also gone to the spot. Somehow, the story sounds familiar!


The incident of a serious crime being committed, this time a child being beaten to death, in the presence of the police without the latter taking any preventive action, is not new. Neither is people taking the law into their hands a new development in the country. Unfortunately, the police going through the sham drill of suspending the guilty policemen is also an old police trick to put the incident in the cold storage. It is only a matter of time before the policemen are reinstated, maybe at some other location. One cannot find fault with the police in the country detrminedly sticking to its track record!
Unless the role of the policemen is treated at par with abetment to murder and exemplary action, with a committed intent to stem the rot, taken against them there will be no let up in criminals roaming freely and the police continuing to remain a rag tag outfit meant to serve only politicians and criminals.

Friday, May 2, 2008

OBC Quota: Politicians in a Hurry








http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Centres_order_on_OBC_quota_in_IIMs_challenged_in_HC/articleshow/3005452.cms
Hope the contention of the alumni association of IIMs that the Supreme Court judgement, which while upholding the OBC reservation policy, had said that it would not be applicable to the higher educational institutions, is upheld by the High Court. The government seeking more time to go through the supreme court judgement before responding to the contentions of the Association of IIMs is indicative of the fact that Arjun Singh, always in a hurry to advance his political ambitions of becoming the prime minister, had not even bothered to study the judgement before ordering implementation of his OBC agenda in higher education.

The nefarious designs of ambitious politicians like Arjun Singh, Anbumani Ramadoss, RK Dhawan, Laloo Prasad Yadav and Mayawati to meddle with quality education in the country need to be demolished in the larger interests of the country.

Thursday, May 1, 2008

The President and All her Kin




President Pratibha Patil's son Rajendra Singh Shekhawat has denied any breach of protocol by him while accompanying his mother on an official visit to Latin America. According to him it was okay to go around on his own even when tax payers finance the trip of the President and her family. If he was so inclined, he could have got a direct flight from Delhi to Florida – and avoided the national embarrassment. Surprisingly, even the President’s office has found "nothing wrong" with wasteful expenditure of exchequer’s money and the utterly uncouth behavior of the President’s son.

To make matters worse, Rajendra Singh Shekhawat’s hollow explanation that he was a mere "visitor" to some of the programmes he had attended and that there was "nothing to discuss" during the visits, raises more questions about his having been included in the President’s entourage in the first place. The President and her son have seen nothing wrong with the son making a trip on the side of the President’s official trip on his own expenditure. Did the President’s son also pay for the officer of the Indian Embassy in Washington to go and receive him at Miami where he was on a private trip? The arguments in favor of the President and her son may sound convincing to the Congress and its UPA allies who were keenly instrumental in replacing Bharat Ratna Dr APJ Abdul Kalam with Pratibha Patil, but do not seem to hold much water for their countrymen. That such goings-on have occurred during the tenures of KR Narayanan and Shankar Dayal Sharma, both Congress nominees, only gives an insight into the Congress culture of selecting the wrong people for the wrong reasons to head responsible positions they lack the merit to hold. Shankar Dayal Sharma, incidentally, holds the distinction of being the only President who refused to vacate the Rashtrapati Bhawan at the end of his tenure, unless an alternative accommodation was suitably prepared to him.

The least the shameless politicians of Congress and its UPA allies can do is gracefully apologize to the nation to stem the growing controversy surrounding the highest office of the land. It would be futile to expect the President’s office and Rajendra Singh Shekhawat to extend such a grand gesture as both have already found nothing amiss in their conduct.